In a previous issue of the Condo Chronicle, I stated that
Council must take action (or not) only after they have looked into the circumstances
and then act reasonably, pursuant to Section 31 Strata Property Act (SPA).
Council members must act with utmost good faith. Not only is that directive
spelled out under the SPA, but Boards, Committees, Strata Councils must
exercise discretion and reasonableness. The strata council must respond to
complaints from owners regarding breaches of the bylaws and may
be required (emphasis added) to take enforcement action with respect
to the bylaws. So what recourse does a strata owner or tenant have if the
action of Council is unreasonable and significantly
unfair—see Section 164 Strata Property Act:
On application of an owner or tenant, the Supreme
Court may make an interim or final order it considers to prevent or remedy a
significantly unfair action or threatened action by, or decision of, the strata
corporation, including the council, relating to the owner or tenant
In these circumstances, the court has broad powers to
direct or prohibit any act by the strata corporation and/or the strata council.
In Reid vs The Owners, (2003) BCCA 126 (CA), the B.C. Court of Appeal said that
the term “significantly unfair” would include conduct that was oppressive
or unfairly prejudicial. The Court used the definition of the word unfair from The Canadian Oxford
Dictionary as: not just, reasonable or
objective”.
Councils must also exercise reasonableness when levying a
fine on an owner or tenant. They must set the amount of the fine commensurate
with the circumstances. Excessive amounts of a fine have been found to be “significantly
unfair”. See Drummond v Strata Plan NW 2654 (2004), 34 BCLR (4th)
359 (BCSC). Facts of this case: a boy of 16 years of age moved in with his
parents in a home in a strata which had an age restriction of 19 years. The
Strata Council fined the parent $200.00 per week for every week the child
resided there. The fines accumulated to $16,400.00. The mother took the matter
to court on the grounds the fine was “significantly unfair”. The judge
agreed and reduced the fine to $1,000.00 even though the Judge found the
defendant parents to have come to court with “unclean hands”. This area of the
law is relatively new, so Courts have been granted great latitude in deciding
cases and subsequent compensation to the aggrieved parties.
There are a number of avenues aggrieved owners and tenants
can take to try to get relief from the unreasonable actions of a strata
council. Some pieces of advice follow: